ROHVA questions mandatory standards for side-by-sides
The Recreational Off-Highway Vehicle Association (ROHVA) is calling on enthusiasts and industry representatives to submit comments by March 15, 2010 in response to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) proposed mandatory standards for Recreational Off-Highway Vehicles (ROVs), also known as side-by-sides and UTVs.
ROHVA previously expressed disappointment with CPSC’s October 2009 vote to issue an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) for mandatory ROV standards. ROHVA believes this action is premature because an American National Standards Institute (ANSI) process to develop standards for ROVs had long been underway. Since that time, the process has been completed and the proposed ANSI standard is under final review. Components of the standard include protective gear requirements, a certified roll-over protective structure, a minimum of three point seatbelts for each seating position, and multiple lateral stability criteria.

ROHVA has created a web page – ROHVA.org/anpr – for enthusiasts and industry representatives that contains explanations of ROHVA’s position on ROV standards and links to important documents. The page also contains a link and other resources to facilitate stakeholders’ submission of comments on the CPSC’s ANPR.
“ROV stakeholders need to be heard on whether the appropriate next step to establish ROV standards is moving forward with CPSC-imposed mandatory federal standards or instead gaining experience under the ANSI standards and promoting the ROV Safety Rules available at ROHVA.org,” says Paul Vitrano, ROHVA executive vice president.

The ANSI standard development process involves a variety of interests including CPSC and other government representatives, industry, consumers and others. Participants reach a consensus on an appropriate ANSI standard for ROV equipment, configuration and performance requirements.
ROHVA has met several times with CPSC staff in an effort to address their concerns about the ANSI standard.
“ROHVA appreciates the Commissioners’ and CPSC staff’s interest in and willingness to discuss key technical issues, and our dialogue has been productive,” says Vitrano. “While there is agreement between CPSC and ROHVA on many aspects of ROV standards, there continues to be disagreement over some important technical issues, including vehicle stability, vehicle handling and occupant protection and retention”
Vitrano concluded, “It also should be noted that the overwhelming majority of ROV operators and passengers use the vehicles safely and responsibly and benefit from the unique recreational and utility capabilities of these vehicles.”
For more information on the Recreational Off-Highway Vehicle Association, visit ROHVA.org.
Related ReadingManufacturers form safety group for side-by-sides







2021 Yamaha Wolverine RMAX2 1000 vs. Polaris General 1000 Deluxe: By the Numbers
2021 Arctic Cat ATV and UTV Lineup
2021 Yamaha Wolverine RMAX2 1000 and RMAX4 1000 Unveiled
2021 Polaris Ranger, RZR and General Lineup Unveiled
2021 Honda Talon 1000X vs. Kawasaki Teryx KRX 1000 vs. Yamaha YXZ1000R: By the Numbers
2021 Polaris Sportsman 570 Ultimate Trail LE Review
2021 Can-Am Outlander 650 DPS vs. Suzuki KingQuad 750AXi Power Steering: By the Numbers
2021 Polaris Sportsman 450 H.O. vs. 2021 Honda Rancher 4x4: By the Numbers
2021 Polaris Sportsman 570 and 450 H.O. Unveiled: Everything You Need To Know
10 Best Polaris RZR Accessories
Into the Wild: 5 Extreme Places You Can Go with ARGO
Best Can-Am Maverick Doors
Best UTV Speakers for Off-Road Music
Snow Problem: Conquer Winter with a Snow Plow from Moose Utility Division
Best ATV Hunting Accessories
6 of the Best Covers for ATVs and UTVs
Basic Wiring Tips for ATVs and UTVs
You May Soon Be Required to Buckle Up in a Kawasaki UTV
The Innovative Engineering that Goes into Every Can-Am Model
Manufacturers form safety group for side-by-sides
Catastrophic Rollover Narrowly Avoided + Video