EPA Hits Suzuki with $885,000 Penalty and Other Sanctions
Published Sep. 17, 2012 1 Updated Jun. 18, 2015
American Suzuki has agreed to a number of sanctions including an $885,000 penalty for importing ATVs and off-road motorcycles that do not meet the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency‘s emission control standards.
The EPA and Suzuki negotiated the monetary penalty as well as other sanctions for the 25,396 units of the 2006-2009 LT-R450 ATV and the 62 units of the 2010 RMX450Z. While the models in question were tested and certified by the EPA, the testing was done on the electronic engine control module’s standard map.
What Suzuki did not disclose in the certification process was the RMX450Z and LT-R450 also had a racing map that would push emissions outside the accepted control standards. These racing map were only accessible from a third-party aftermarket product known as the “Cherry Bomb“, but because the map was pre-programmed into the stock machine, Suzuki was required to disclose the ability to adjust the air-fuel mixture through engine mapping when filing for the certificate of conformity. We actually tested out the Yoshimura Cherry Bomb on a 2009 LT-R450 (along with other Yoshimura products), which you can read about here.
In addition to the $885,000 fine, Suzuki agreed to a three emissions mitigation projects that would reduce the emission of over 210 tons of hydrocarbons.
For the 2013 model year, Suzuki has agreed to equip 1,924 non-California bound on-road motorcycles with emissions equipment to meet the more stringent California Air Resource Board‘s requirements. The EPA expects this measure will reduce hydrocarbon emissions by 155.6 tons.
Suzuki also agreed to provide local U.S. jurisdictions with EPA-regulated portable fuel containers to replace older, unregulated containers. The EPA estimates a reduction of 42.02 tons of hydrocarbons from this measure.
And finally, Suzuki agreed to discontinue sale of high-permeability fuel line hoses for 2006 and 2007 model year on- and off-road motorcycles as well as ATVs. Suzuki will instead introduce low-permeability fuel line hoses that meet current EPA specifications and result in the estimated reduction of 14.2 tons of hydrocarbons.







2021 Yamaha Wolverine RMAX2 1000 vs. Polaris General 1000 Deluxe: By the Numbers
2021 Arctic Cat ATV and UTV Lineup
2021 Yamaha Wolverine RMAX2 1000 and RMAX4 1000 Unveiled
2021 Polaris Ranger, RZR and General Lineup Unveiled
2021 Honda Talon 1000X vs. Kawasaki Teryx KRX 1000 vs. Yamaha YXZ1000R: By the Numbers
2021 Polaris Sportsman 570 Ultimate Trail LE Review
2021 Can-Am Outlander 650 DPS vs. Suzuki KingQuad 750AXi Power Steering: By the Numbers
2021 Polaris Sportsman 450 H.O. vs. 2021 Honda Rancher 4x4: By the Numbers
2021 Polaris Sportsman 570 and 450 H.O. Unveiled: Everything You Need To Know
10 Best Polaris RZR Accessories
Into the Wild: 5 Extreme Places You Can Go with ARGO
Best Can-Am Maverick Doors
Best UTV Speakers for Off-Road Music
Snow Problem: Conquer Winter with a Snow Plow from Moose Utility Division
Best ATV Hunting Accessories
6 of the Best Covers for ATVs and UTVs
Basic Wiring Tips for ATVs and UTVs
2019 Suzuki KingQuad Lineup Preview
5 Youth ATVs You Probably Miss From Your Childhood